PUBLICATIONS & ABSTRACTS: CLINICAL EVIDENCE
100s of extensive peer reviewed publications and studies utilizing MammaPrint + BluePrint have observed benefits from treatment in the following areas of clinical utility:
Scientific evidence for clinical utility.
By continually expanding and strengthening our database of proven research including 20+ years of clinical validation and 200+ research collaborations, we have gained widespread trust in the precision, accuracy and quality of our MammaPrint® and BluePrint® test suite.
Evidence
Lobular Histology and Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Invasive Breast Cancer
PUBLICATION: Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Nov;136(1):35-43. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2233-z. Epub 2012 Sep 8. AUTHORS: Lips E.H., Mukhtar R.A., Yau C., de Ronde J.J., Livasy C., Carey L.A., Loo C.E., Vrancken-Peeters M.J., Sonke G.S., Berry D.A., Van't Veer L.J., Esserman L.J., Wesseling J., Rodenhuis S., Shelley Hwang E.; I-SPY TRIAL Investigators. Read More
Comparison of Molecular Subtyping with BluePrint, MammaPrint, and TargetPrint to Local Clinical Subtyping in Breast Cancer Patients
PUBLICATION: Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Oct;19(10):3257-63. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2561-6. Epub 2012 Aug 15. AUTHORS: Nguyen B., Cusumano P.G., Deck K., Kerlin D., Garcia A.A., Barone J..L, Rivera E., Yao K., de Snoo F.A., van den Akker J., Stork-Sloots L., Generali D. SUMMARY: The concordance between BluePrint and IHC/FISH subtyping was 94% Read More
Economic Evaluation of the 70-gene Prognosis-Signature (MammaPrint®) in Hormone Receptor-Positive, Lymph Node-Negative, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Type 2-Negative Early Stage Breast Cancer in Japan
PUBLICATION: Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Jun;133(2):759-68. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-1979-7. AUTHORS: Kondo M., Hoshi S.L., Ishiguro H., Toi M. SUMMARY: The introduction of the assay into Japanese practice of ER+, LN−, HER2− ESBC treatment by including it to Japan’s social health insurance benefit package has a reasonable chance to be judged Read More
A Diagnostic Gene Profile for Molecular Subtyping of Breast Cancer Associated with Treatment Response
PUBLICATION: Breast Cancer Res Treat (2012) 133: 37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1683-z. AUTHORS: Oscar Krijgsman, Paul Roepman, Wilbert Zwart, Jason S. Carroll, Sun Tian, Femke A. de Snoo, Richard A. Bender, Rene Bernards, Annuska M. Glas SUMMARY: BluePrint classification of a patient cohort that was treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 133) shows Read More
Cost Effectiveness of Gene Expression Profiling for Early Stage Breast Cancer: a Decision-Analytic Mode
PUBLICATION: Cancer. 2012 Oct 15;118(20):5163-70. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27443. Epub 2012 Feb 22. AUTHORS: Yang M., Rajan S., Issa A.M. SUMMARY: The model suggested that MammaPrint is a more cost‐effective GEP test compared with Oncotype DX at a threshold willingness‐to‐pay of $50,000 per QALY. Read more: Yang et al_2012_Cancer_Cost Effectiveness of Gene Read More
Head-to-Head Comparison of the 70-gene Signature Versus the 21-Gene Assay: Cost-Effectiveness and the Effect of Compliance
PUBLICATION: Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Jan;131(2):627-36. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1769-7. Epub 2011 Sep 24. AUTHORS: Retèl V.P., Joore M.A., van Harten W.H. SUMMARY: The 21-gene has the highest probability of being cost-effective when focusing on cost/LY, while focusing on cost/QALY, the 70-gene signature was most cost-effective. Read more: Breast Cancer Res Read More
Impact of Mammographic Screening on the Detection of Good and Poor Prognosis Breast Cancers
PUBLICATION: Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Dec;130(3):725-34. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1748-z. Epub 2011 Sep 4. AUTHORS: Esserman L.J., Shieh Y., Rutgers E.J., Knauer M., Retèl V.P., Mook S., Glas A.M., Moore D.H., Linn S., van Leeuwen F.E., van 't Veer L.J. SUMMARY: In women aged 49-60, the time period of diagnosis significantly Read More
