OTHER PUBLICATIONS & ABSTRACTS

Other Data


Evidence / Other

Comparison of Molecular Subtyping with BluePrint, MammaPrint, and TargetPrint to Local Clinical Subtyping in Breast Cancer Patients

PUBLICATION: Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Oct;19(10):3257-63. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2561-6. Epub 2012 Aug 15. AUTHORS: Nguyen B., Cusumano P.G., Deck K., Kerlin D., Garcia A.A., Barone J..L, Rivera E., Yao K., de Snoo F.A., van den Akker J., Stork-Sloots L., Generali D. SUMMARY: The concordance between BluePrint and IHC/FISH subtyping was 94% Read More

Economic Evaluation of the 70-gene Prognosis-Signature (MammaPrint®) in Hormone Receptor-Positive, Lymph Node-Negative, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Type 2-Negative Early Stage Breast Cancer in Japan

PUBLICATION: Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Jun;133(2):759-68. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-1979-7. AUTHORS: Kondo M., Hoshi S.L., Ishiguro H., Toi M. SUMMARY: The introduction of the assay into Japanese practice of ER+, LN−, HER2− ESBC treatment by including it to Japan’s social health insurance benefit package has a reasonable chance to be judged Read More

Head-to-Head Comparison of the 70-gene Signature Versus the 21-Gene Assay: Cost-Effectiveness and the Effect of Compliance

PUBLICATION: Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Jan;131(2):627-36. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1769-7. Epub 2011 Sep 24. AUTHORS: Retèl V.P., Joore M.A., van Harten W.H. SUMMARY: The 21-gene has the highest probability of being cost-effective when focusing on cost/LY, while focusing on cost/QALY, the 70-gene signature was most cost-effective. Read more: Breast Cancer Res Read More